Analysis and Selection of Test Cases for Validating 6DOF Dynamic Mesh Technique

Authors

  • Nicolás Trivisonno Centro de Investigación de Métodos Computacionales, Universidad Nacional del Litoral - CONICET. Santa Fe, Argentina. & Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Ingeniería y Agrimensura. Rosario, Argentina.
  • Horacio J. Aguerre Centro de Investigación de Métodos Computacionales, Universidad Nacional del Litoral - CONICET. Santa Fe, Argentina.
  • Juan M. Gimenez Centro de Investigación de Métodos Computacionales, Universidad Nacional del Litoral - CONICET. Santa Fe, Argentina. & Centro Internacional de Métodos Numéricos en Ingeniería. Barcelona, España.
  • Luciano Garelli Centro de Investigación de Métodos Computacionales, Universidad Nacional del Litoral - CONICET. Santa Fe, Argentina.
  • Norberto M. Nigro Centro de Investigación de Métodos Computacionales, Universidad Nacional del Litoral - CONICET & Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Hídricas. Santa Fe, Argentina.
  • Mario A. Storti Centro de Investigación de Métodos Computacionales, Universidad Nacional del Litoral - CONICET & Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Hídricas. Santa Fe, Argentina.

Keywords:

Moving Mesh Technique, Dynamic Mesh, Slinding-Mesh Method, ALE formulation, Immersed- Boundary Method, Re-meshing, Computational Fluid Dynamics

Abstract

This study focuses on the selection of examples to evaluate a numerical mesh movement strategy, aimed at validating the development of a newly proposed technique. The method’s reliability is assessed through various test cases, verifying its compliance with the Geometric Conservation Law (GCL), a necessary and sufficient condition to ensure the numerical stability of the method. Then, the accuracy is tested against known benchmark problems with analytical or experimental results. The selected cases include 2D geometries, cover transient Taylor-Green vortices, a cylinder undergoing simultaneous translation and rotation, and the oscillatory motion of a NACA0012 airfoil. These benchmark cases provide a comprehensive validation of the proposed technique’s performance and stability, facilitating the development of future dynamic mesh strategies.

Published

2025-03-06

Issue

Section

Abstracts in MECOM 2024

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>