Comparative Study of the Adsortion Mechanisms of 5- Fluorouracyl on Silica and Graphene

Authors

  • Emilia Noseda Grau Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad Regional Bahía Blanca. Bahía Blanca, Argentina. & Universidad Nacional del Sur, Departamento de Física, Instituto de Física del Sur & CONICET. Bahía Blanca, Argentina.
  • Gabriela Dodero Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad Regional Bahía Blanca. Bahía Blanca, Argentina. & Universidad Nacional del Sur, Departamento de Física, Instituto de Física del Sur & CONICET. Bahía Blanca, Argentina.
  • Andrés Díaz Compañy Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad Regional Bahía Blanca. Bahía Blanca, Argentina. & Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas. La Plata, Argentina.
  • Sandra Ulacco Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad Regional Bahía Blanca. Bahía Blanca, Argentina.
  • Sandra Simonetti Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad Regional Bahía Blanca. Bahía Blanca, Argentina. & Universidad Nacional del Sur, Departamento de Física, Instituto de Física del Sur & CONICET. Bahía Blanca, Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70567/mc.v41i22.116

Keywords:

5-FU, silica, activated carbon, DFT

Abstract

Catheter degradation in 5-FU drug administration can be reduced by applying protective coatings on the inner/outer surface of the catheters. Our DFT computational results on the binding energy, charge exchange and orbital population of the drug 5-FU adsorbed on the surface of silica and graphene confirm weak interactions between the drug and the adsorbents that could favor desorption of the drug during administration. The silica and graphene surfaces do not react with the molecule, behaving as inert materials, and the drug does not suffer degradation or alter its structure during adsorption in both materials. These conditions, in addition to biocompatibility and antimicrobial properties of these materials, suggest that silica and graphene could be used as promising internal/external coatings for biomedical applications.

References

Fackler Schwalbe I., Schwalbe B., Epple M., Becker A., Prügl L., Gassel W., Stoffels D.,Südhoff T.. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 89:547, 2004.

Gurunathan S., Han J.W., Eppakayala V., Dayem A. A., Kwon N. D., Kim J. H.. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 8, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-8-393

O'Grady N. P., Alexander M., Burns L. A., Dellinger E. P., Garland J., Heard S. O., Lipsett P. A., Masur H., Mermel L. A., Pearson M. L., et al.. Clin. Infect. Dis. 52: e162, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir257

Ohulchanskyy T.Y., Roy I., Goswami L.N., et al. Nano Lett. 7:2835, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0714637

Park S.C., Chun H.J., Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: review and update of current practices, Gut Liver 7:385, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2013.7.4.385

Terzyk A.P., Furmaniak S., Gauden P.A., Harris P.J.F., Wloch J., Kowalczyk P. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 19: 406208, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/19/40/406208

Ugliengo P., Sodupe M., Musso F., Bush I.J., Orlando R., Dovesi R.. Adv. Mater. 20:4579, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200801489

Published

2024-11-08

Issue

Section

Conference Papers in MECOM 2024