Metallic and Polymeric Dental Implants: Comparison of the Primary Stability of the Bone-Dental Implant Interface Using Acoustic Emission

Authors

  • Rodrigo de Prada Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Facultad de Ingeniería. Río Cuarto, Argentina.
  • Pablo Varela Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Facultad de Ingeniería. Río Cuarto, Argentina.
  • María Evangelina Montiel Practica Privada
  • Diego D. Gallo Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Facultad de Ingeniería. Río Cuarto, Argentina.
  • Leonardo Molisani Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Facultad de Ingeniería. Río Cuarto, Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70567/mc.v42.ocsid8581

Keywords:

Dental implant, Implant osseointegration, Acoustic emission

Abstract

Dental implants are used for the reconstruction of missing teeth. Although they have high success rates, failures still occur. The difficult aspect to control is the interface between the implant and the bone into which it is inserted. Traditionally, titanium and its alloys have been used as implant materials, but more recently, the use of polymeric materials such as PEEK (Polyether Ether Ketone) has been proposed. This work proposes the use of the Acoustic Emission technique to monitor the primary stability of the bone-dental implant interface and, fundamentally, to compare the signals obtained when primary stability is lost. To achieve this objective, various implants were first inserted into a maxilla made of synthetic material; and then, the primary stability of the interface of said synthetic material with each implant was verified using the Acoustic Emission technique, applying a compressive load to the implant. The tests carried out highlighted the enormous advantages of using Acoustic Emission, since it allows the detection of poor bone-dental implant integration.

References

Archi Parekh, Hitakshi Doifode, Prasad Patil, Ritik Katole, Amol Pitale, Nilesh Awate and Praneeta Priya. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering: 1259 012045, 2022, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/1259/1/012045.

Haïat G, Wang H L, Brunski J, Effects of Biomechanical Properties of the Bone–Implant Interface on Dental Implant Stability: From In Silico Approaches to the Patient’s Mouth. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng, 2014, 16, 187e213.

Hatim Alqurashi, Zohaib Khurshid, Azeem Ul Yaqin Syed, Syed Rashid Habib, Dinesh Rokaya, Muhammad Sohail Zafar, Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK): An emerging biomaterial for oral implants and dental prostheses, Journal of Advanced Research, Volume 28, 2021, Pages 87-95, ISSN 2090-1232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.09.004.

Jiang, X., Yao, Y., Tang, W., Han, D., Zhang, L., Zhao, K., Wang, S., & Meng, Y. (2020). Design of dental implants at materials level: An overview. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 108(8), 1634–1661. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36931.

Lin D, Li Q, Li W, Duckmanton N, Swain M. Mandibular bone remodelling induced by dental implant. J Biomech, 2010, 43, 287e93.

Mavrogordato M, Taylor M, Taylor A, Browne M. Real time monitoring of progressive damage during loading of a simplified total hip stem implant using embedded acoustic emission sensors. Med Eng Phys, 2011, 33, 395e406.

Montiel M. E., Varela P. G., de Prada R. E., Ibañez J. C., Empleo de emisión acústica para verificar la estabilidad primaria de interfase hueso-implante dental. X Jornadas Nacionales de la Asociación Prostodóntica Argentina. Santa Fe, Argentina, 22 de Junio de 2018a.

Montiel M. E., Varela P. G., Ibañez J. C., Acoustic emission employment to verify stability of bone-dental implant interface. Congreso Dental Mundial, fdi, Buenos Aires, 5 al 8 de Setiembre de 2018. P070. International Dental Journal 2018b; 68 (Suppl. 2): pp 40. https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12440.

Montiel María Evangelina, Varela Pablo Gerardo, de Prada Rodrigo Enzo, Ibañez Juan Carlos, Monitoreo de la Estabilidad de Interfase Hueso-Implante Dental. Congreso ITI Argentina & Uruguay. Buenos Aires, 19 al 21 de Setiembre de 2019. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21664.74240.

Mouhyi, J., Dohan Ehrenfest, D. M., & Albrektsson, T. (2012). The peri-implantitis: Implant surfaces, microstructure, and physicochemical aspects. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 14(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00244.x

Ossi Z, Abdou W, Reuben RL, Ibbetson RJ. In vitro assessment of bone-implant interface using an acoustic emission transmission test. Proc IMechE, 2011, 226(1), 63e9.

Reddy, K. U. K., Verma, P. C., Rathi, A., & Saravanan, P. (2023). A comprehensive mechanical characterization of as-printed and saliva soaked 3D printed PEEK specimens for low-cost dental implant applications. Materials Today Communications, 36, 106438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106438

Roques A, Browne M, Thompson J, Rowland C, Taylor A. Investigation of fatigue crack growth in acrylic bone cement using the acoustic emission technique. Biomaterials, 2004, 25, 769e78.

Santulli C, Billi F, Normal and off-axis compression tests of biocompatible titanium dental implants monitored by acoustic emission. J. of Materials Science Letters, 2002, 21, 727-e30. Schrooten J, Helsen JA. Adhesion of bioactive glass coating to Ti6AlV oral implant. Biomaterials, 2000, 21(2000), 1461e9.

Westover L, Faulkner G, Hodgetts W and Raboud D, Advanced System For Implant Stability Testing (ASIST), J. of Biomechanics, 2016, 49, 3651e59.

Published

2025-11-27