Partial Loss-of-Flow Transient in SMART’s Hottest Fuel Element: A CFD and System-Code Comparison

Authors

  • Cristian G. de Oliveira Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Engenharia Nuclear. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1073-7041
  • Alirio J. Sarache Piña Centro de Investigación de Métodos Computacionales (CIMEC), CONICET-UNL. Santa Fe, Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1339-8460
  • Antonella L. Costa Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Engenharia Nuclear. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2445-3800
  • Clarysson A. M. Silva Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Engenharia Nuclear. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3082-644X
  • Damián Ramajo Centro de Investigación de Métodos Computacionales (CIMEC), CONICET-UNL. Santa Fe, Argentina.
  • Darío M. Godino Centro de Investigación de Métodos Computacionales (CIMEC), CONICET-UNL. Santa Fe, Argentina. & Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad Regional Paraná. Paraná, Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1204-5498

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70567/mc.v42.ocsid8374

Keywords:

SMR, SMART, Thermal-hydraulic, CFD, STHIRP, OpenFOAM

Abstract

A loss-of-flow transient featuring a fifty percent reduction in coolant mass flow was simulated for the highest-power fuel element of the 330 MW SMART small modular reactor. Two complementary thermal-hydraulic tools were employed: the lumped-parameter system code STHIRP and a three-dimensional conjugate-heat-transfer model in OpenFOAM. The domain exploits one-eighth symmetry of the 17×17 fuel assembly and includes fuel, cladding (as thermal resistance) and coolant. Steady-state baseline simulations under nominal flow conditions were first validated against theoretical predictions of temperature variation. Subsequently, the transient flow reduction was imposed, and the temporal evolutions of the coolant outlet temperature, fuel-clad maximum temperature, and pressure drop were predicted. OpenFOAM predicted a 38 K rise in outlet temperature and a peak fuel temperature of 1305 K. The good agreement in trends between the two codes demonstrates both the viability of high-fidelity CFD for detailed local analysis and the efficiency of lumped-parameter codes for rapid safety assessments.

References

Agency I.A.E. Nuclear power reactors in the world. IAEA Publication, 2021.

Bobkov V., Fokin L., Petrov E., Popov V., Rumiantsev V., and Savvatimsky A. Thermophysical properties of materials for nuclear engineering: a tutorial and collection of data. IAEA, Vienna, pages 18–21, 2008.

cfd online. openfoam documentation. 2024. Acessado em: 2024.

De Souza W.F. Avaliação termo-hidráulica para combustível nuclear de alto desempenho utilizando o código de subcanais sthirp. Master Thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2019.

International Energy Agency. India energy outlook 2021. IEA Special Report, 2021. Accessed: 2025-09-16.

Laturkar K. Advances of very small modular nuclear reactors. 2022. April, 2022.

Park S.Y., Lee C.C., Song J.S., Cho B.O., and Zee S.Q. Nuclear characteristics analysis report for system-integrated modular advanced reactor. Technical Report, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 1998.

U.S. Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Outlook 2012 with Projections to 2035. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2012. Accessed: 2025-09-16.

Veloso M. Pantera-1p: Programa para análise termo-hidráulica do núcleo de reatores a água. In Proceedings of the 3rd Brazilian Meeting on Reactor Physics and Thermal Hydraulics, Itaipava, RJ, Brazil, pages 11–14. 1982.

Yoon J., Ryu S.Y., Choi B.S., Lee M., and Zee S.K. Plant system design features of smart. 2003.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-05

Issue

Section

Conference Papers in MECOM 2025