Nominal Wake Prediction For Marine Propeller Design Using OpenFOAM

Authors

  • Nicolás A. Antonelli Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad Regional Mar del Plata, Grupo HidroSim & Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ingeniería, Grupo de Ingeniería Asistida por Computadora (GIAC) & Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Mar del Plata, Argentina.
  • Gustavo E. Carr Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ingeniería, Grupo de Ingeniería Asistida por Computadora (GIAC) & Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Mar del Plata, Argentina.
  • Santiago A. Urquiza Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad Regional Mar del Plata, Grupo HidroSim & Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ingeniería, Grupo de Ingeniería Asistida por Computadora (GIAC). Mar del Plata, Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70567/mc.v42.ocsid8228

Keywords:

Marine hydrodynamics, Nominal wake, Marine propulsion, Propeller design

Abstract

The propulsive efficiency of a ship is intrinsically linked to the interaction between the hull and the propeller. A determining factor in this interaction is the nominal wake, defined as the velocity profile that the hull generates in the area where the propeller will operate, prior to its installation. An accurate characterization of this wake is fundamental for the design and selection of propellers that can operate optimally under the flow conditions induced by the hull. In this work, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are employed using OpenFOAM and the RANS model with the Volume of Fluid (VOF) approach to analyze the flow around the hull and obtain the nominal wake. The results obtained are compared with a benchmark case study, allowing for the evaluation of the accuracy of the CFD model in predicting the flow behavior generated by the hull without the influence of the propeller.

References

Bhushan S., Xing T., Visonneau M.,Wackers J., Deng G., Stern F., y Larsson L. Post workshop computations and analysis for kvlcc2 and 5415. En L. Larsson, F. Stern, y M. Visonneau, editores, Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics: An Assessment of the Gothenburg 2010 Workshop, páginas 265–318. Springer Dordrecht, 2014. ISBN 978-94-007-7188-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7189-5_7

Broglia R., Dubbioso G., Durante D., y Mascio A.D. Simulation of turning circle by CFD: Analysis of different propeller models and their effect on manoeuvring prediction. Appl. Ocean Res., 39:1–10, 2013.

Delen C. y Bal S. Telfer’s geosim method revisited by cfd. The International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 161:467–478, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3940/rina.ijme.2019.a4.563.

Guo L., Yu J., Chen J., Jiang K., y Feng D. Unsteady viscous CFD simulations of KCS behaviour and performance in head seas. En Volume 2: CFD and FSI. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2018.

Han X., Leira B.J., y Sævik S. Vessel hydrodynamic model tuning by discrete bayesian updating using simulated onboard sensor data. Ocean Eng., 220(108407):108407, 2021.

Kumar M., Ananthasubramanian V., y Singh S.P. Prediction of heave, pitch and roll ship motions in waves using RANSE method. En Volume 5: Materials Technology; CFD and VIV. ASMEDC, 2008.

Li X., Dong J., y Sun S. Numerical simulation and analysis of nominal wake of displacement ship. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1834(1):012018, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1834/1/012018.

Stern F., Yang J.,Wang Z., Sadat-Hosseini H., Mousaviraad M., Bhushan S., y Xing T. Computational ship hydrodynamics: Nowadays and way forward. International shipbuilding progress, 60(1-4):3 – 105, 2013. ISSN 0020-868X. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISP-130090.

Published

2025-12-05

Issue

Section

Conference Papers in MECOM 2025