Seismic Response of Reinforced Concrete Structures to Impulsive And Vibratory Earthquake

Authors

  • Leonela J. Avalos Universidad Tecnologica Nacional, Facultad Regional Mendoza, CeReDeTeC. Mendoza, Argentina.
  • Nicolás A. Bustos Universidad Tecnologica Nacional, Facultad Regional Mendoza, CeReDeTeC. Mendoza, Argentina.
  • Camila R. Gaviola Universidad Tecnologica Nacional, Facultad Regional Mendoza, CeReDeTeC. Mendoza, Argentina.
  • Carlos D. Frau Universidad Tecnologica Nacional, Facultad Regional Mendoza, CeReDeTeC. Mendoza, Argentina.
  • Miguel C. Tornello Universidad Tecnologica Nacional, Facultad Regional Mendoza, CeReDeTeC. Mendoza, Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70567/mc.v42.ocsid8606

Keywords:

impulsive and vibratory earthquakes, seismic response

Abstract

The structural analysis of buildings located in seismic zones has been constantly updated in recent decades due to the adaptation of regulations following earthquakes. Structural engineering has adequate tools to predict seismic responses through mechanical and numerical models; however, there are uncertainties regarding the characteristics of earthquakes to be used as input for evaluating seismic response. Responses to earthquakes with impulsive characteristics are partially considered in our regulations. This paper studies the responses of three structural systems: a ten-story, three-span, frame building, another ten-span, single-story, frame building, and a ten-story frame-partition building, all of which are subject to ground motions with impulsive and vibratory characteristics. The responses are evaluated using linear static and dynamic analyses. It is observed that the static method covers the demands better than the dynamic methods, that low structures are less sensitive to impulsive earthquakes, and that differences appear in the response of flexible structures depending on whether the input is impulsive or vibratory.

References

AlaviI, B. y Krawinkler H. Effects of Near-Field Ground Motion on Building Structures. CUREE Publication Nº CKIII-02. CUREE-Kajima Joint. Research Program, Phase II. 2001.

Anderson, J. C. y Bertero V. V. Uncertainties in Establishing Design Earthquakes. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 113, Nº 8, 1709-1724. 1987. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:8(1709)

Baez, J. I. y Miranda, E. Amplification factors to estimate inelastic displacement demands for the design of structures in the near field. 12th World Conference in Earthquake Engineering. Paper Nº 1561, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering. 2000.

Bertero V. V. Establishment of design Earthquake: evaluation of present methods. Proceeding, International Symposium on Earthquake Structural Engineering. Vol. 1, St Louis, University of Missouri - Rolla, 551-580. 1976.

Frau C. D., Saragoni G. R. Demanda Sísmica de fuente cercana. Situación del Oeste Argentino. Congreso Chileno de Sismología e Ingeniería Antisísmica. IX Jornadas. Concepción de Chile. 16-19/11/2005. CD: A01-18. 2005.

INPRES-CIRSOC 103, Parte I. Reglamento argentino para construcciones sismorresistente. 2018.

Iwan, W. D. Evaluation of the effects of near-source ground motions [on line]. PG&E PEER. Directed Studies Program, Berkeley. 1998. [Available in http://peer.berkeley.edu/news/1998may/nsource.html].

Panella D.S, Tornello M.E, Frau C.D. A simple and intuitive procedure to identify pulse-like ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 94: 234-243. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.020

Sasani, M., Bertero, V. Importance of severe pulse-type ground motions in performance based engineering: historical and critical review. 12th Conference on Earthquake on Engineering,New Zeeland, paper 1302. 2000.

Somerville P.; Chandan S., Wald D., Graves R. Implications of the Northridge Earthquake for Strong Ground Motions from Thrust Fault. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. Vol. 86, Nº 1B, pp S115-S125. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA08601BS115

Published

2025-11-28

Issue

Section

Conference Papers in MECOM 2025