Comparison of a DNB Calculation in a Single Channel Model Using System Codes TRACE5 and RELAP5
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70567/mc.v41i18.94Keywords:
Nuclear reactor, Thermohydraulic calculation, RELAP5, TRACE5Abstract
System codes TRACE5 and RELAP5 are used for predicting and analyzing the thermohydraulic behaviour of nuclear reactors. Although being used for the same purposes, they differ in their calculation methodologies, numerical methods, algebraic correlations, hydraulic components and user options. In some applications, these codes calculate the Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB), which is one of the most important phenomena which may occur in a nuclear reactor and it is highly relevant for nuclear safety. In this work, both codes are used to calculate the DNB Ratio and the pressure and temperature profiles of the same PHWR single channel model. In both cases, the same geometry and boundary conditions were used so the differences in the results are attributed to the numerical methodologies, user functions and, most important, the numerical methods of each code. This work aims to compare the consistency of the results obtained, analyze the capability of each code to reproduce the thermohydraulic methodology and analyze the impact of user options in the results.
References
Nuclear Systems Analysis Operations, Information Systems Laboratories, RELAP5/MOD3.3
Code Manual Volume I: Code Structure, System Models, and Solution Methods, October 2013.
Division of System Analysis. U.S. NRC, TRACE V5.840 Theory Manual. 2013.
Noori, R.M., Saeed, A.F., A study of finding empirical correlation for the Nusselt number and the factors influencing it for perforated fin array of different shapes, Enero 2013, Ain Shams Engineering Journal.
Holland, F.A., Bragg, R., Fluid Flow for Chemical Engineers, 1995, Segunda edición.
Leiner, W., Heat transfer by nucleate pool boiling-general correlation based on thermodynamic similarity, Marzo 1994, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(94)90114-7
Mahaffy, J.M., A test for stability of linear differential delay equations, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/666674
Micaelli, J. C., Document de Synthese CATHARE (CATHARE An Advanced Best-Estimated Code for PWR Safety Analysis), 1987.
Ransom, V. H., Numerical Modeling of Two-Phase Flows for Presentation at Ecole d'Ete d'Analyse Numerique, 1989.
Palao, C.M., Cuervo Gomez, D., Análisis de Sensibilidad del flujo crítico de calor en un elemento PWR, Junio 2018.
NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) webbook, https://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/, 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Argentine Association for Computational Mechanics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This publication is open access diamond, with no cost to authors or readers.
Only those papers that have been accepted for publication and have been presented at the AMCA congress will be published.